Downloadable version (Microsoft Word document)
An effective conclusion is essential to the success of your paper. Most readers will remember the last paragraph more than any other part of your document. Like a prosecuting attorney's closing appeal to the jury, a conclusion is your last chance to convince the reader of your argument or to reemphasize your main point. In other words, the conclusion should leave the reader with a clear understanding of what you have been trying to show in the paper. Try to think of it as a finale, rather than a summary.
Recall the thesis or purpose of your paper—this isn’t necessarily a restatement of your thesis; rather, it is a culmination of the ideas that your paper has presented. Here you often will give a quick recap of a significant point that you plan to re-address in your conclusion.
Ask “So What?” Why should your audience care about what you’ve said? What should they understand now that they’ve read your paper? How does it apply to a more general audience? Use the conclusion to frame the argument of your paper in the context of a bigger issue.
Provide a sense of closure. Leave the audience thinking about your subject in an interesting way. This could be a challenging comment about the issue you’re addressing, a particularly effective quote, or a serious question.
You should do more than just mechanically restate what you have already said in the body of your paper. It’s nice to add some extra flavor to your conclusion. Here are some tips that can take your conclusion beyond mere summary:
These ideas will help your conclusions be more interesting.
Note: The examples given are ideas to be explored throughout a conclusion and not simply sentences to be tacked on to the end of a summary of your paper.
If I have argued throughout my paper that the portrayal of Batman in the movie Batman Begins is the theatrical depiction most true to the comic book hero, the following might be an effective course of action:
Directors in Hollywood looking to bring a comic book to life on the silver screen should use this movie as an exceptional model. They must put in the effort to closely examine a character’s true comic book nature before representing them in a film.
If I have argued throughout my paper that the portrayal of Batman in the movie Batman Begins is the theatrical depiction most true to the comic book hero, the following might be an effective personal application:
Christian Bale’s representation of Batman has permanently altered my understanding of comic book heroes and will forever change my expectation of what a hero is.
Note: Because the personal application takes the first person [I, we, etc.], it may not be appropriate for all paper types.
If I have argued throughout my paper that the portrayal of Batman in the movie Batman Begins is the theatrical depiction most true to the comic book hero, the following might effectively relate this to the audience:
American society has been overly inundated with cutesy heroes that lack any resemblance of their originally vengeful selves. For those who embrace the true nature of comic book heroes, the portrayal of Batman here is an essential step to recreating what theatrical renditions of comics have been sorely missing. To devalue the original motives and intent of such heroes is unfair to both the author and the truest of fans.
If I have argued throughout my paper that the portrayal of Batman in the movie Batman Begins is the theatrical depiction most true to the comic book hero, I might begin the paper by talking about an upbeat representation of Batman in previous movies and then refer back to this representation in the end, focusing specifically on why I have proven in my paper that this depiction is inadequate.